Obama Wins! Men & Race Superior To Women.

The following editorial specifies the magnitude and scope of my opinion to the situations at hand. This has gone on long enough. I am not with the Clinton or Obama campaigns. I am also not with the Republicans either. I am not a staunch crusader for politics. I am for Truth- in fairness and against corruption- in media, politics and religion. I am also sorry to hear of the voters in Florida and Michigan whose voices are appearing to be ignored during the Democratic race for the presidential nomination- because of a few mistakes- so much for democracy. Now they are helpless- victims of 'bad politics'.

There are other types of 'bad politics'. Let us break this all down. Let us break any delusions that so plague the air of the Democratic campaign and those parties that aid and abed human error. I am displeased at the media and defecting politicians for how they treated Hillary. There has been corruption and lip service and for all the wrong reasons. It was good that some media personalities, like Wolfe Blitzer for example and some others interviewed her with respect. I would not even be surprised if Larry King was kind to Hillary. He is a kind personality. The infamous Jack Cafferty on the other hand, who I would call "Jack the Ripper" would "appear" to be the Hillary hater.... and how. He has done good reporting on other issues, but his apparent crusade against Hillary is both pompous and childish. So, I will not say a mouth full to him- it might give him a coronary followed by a long overdue retirement plan. All I will say, aside from the "Jack the Ripper" alias is that he reminds me of the Wizard of Oz meets Hannibal Lecter. 

Why the "crown of thorns" on Hillary's head and the "baby powder" on Obama's 'bottom'? Unfortunately, it would appear as though a lot of the media and politicians hate Hillary, and do not want a "nagging woman" in the top rank of president. Most men I have spoken to throughout my life have always said that they would never want a woman to run a country and nag her way through wars and laws. Hence we have the word "nag". We also have "ego". It would appear that it does not matter if a candidate has no experience and becomes the next president- so long as it is a man. That type of logic is just plainly ridiculous and ancient. Even the CBC did a poor documentary on Hillary in a segment of The National some months back. Did the CBC do the same to Obama? No. A lot of politicians endorse Obama because he has a likable and friendly personality- so does 'used car salesmen' . Even governments like Hamas and possibly other militant Islamic extremist groups endorse Obama. The Nation of Islam, known as the 'pro black extremists', endorse Obama. Think about that for a moment. I am not saying that he is a member of those groups, nor am I saying that he backs those groups. I say that because some are saying that I am making those allegations. Maybe they should read my article more carefully instead of just simply skimming through it.

It seems more and more like Obama is going to be the winner- and Florida and Michigan have nothing to say about it, whether it be 'for' or 'against' it.. Several magazines have listed silly to blatantly ridiculous titles like "And The Winner Is..." with Obama's picture on the front cover. As more people defect over to Obama from Hillary it would seem more plausible that they need new specks and brain scans. What? They do? Yes, they do. So yes, Obama would seem to be the winner- a school boy in charge of the national school board. Truly truly sad. I do not know about you, but I would not be a passenger on a plane if I knew the pilot had no pilot's license or flight school experience. 

We can thank a few features for this. Maybe the following people who are part of these letters can read and learn.

(A): We can thank the media for giving red carpet attention to Obama, save for the Rev. Wright issues. Still we can thank the media for giving him more positive lip service without criticizing his lack of experience and charisma. They held his hand and kissed his hide throughout his campaign, while they crowned Hillary with thorns. Blood trickles down her face from the thorns while Obama's 'bottom' is being caked in baby powder. Good job, media. We can thank the media for swarming all over Hillary with almost one blatant attack after another- like a horde of sadistic and narcissistic locusts in a wheat field and.. 

(B): We can thank the race card too, almost definitely. Now I am all for racial unity and love people of all races. I do not serve a racist kingdom of God. However, people are so annoyed of hearing about the race card. It is a "get out of jail free card"- it worked for OJ Simpson. Many of us would say nothing if Obama had the experience as much as Hillary and McCain do, but he does not. He does not have any experience or expertise- at all- for the role he wishes to undertake. If he had the qualifications and experience I would say "Go for it Obama!". The thing is that he has none of the experience or expertise of his competitors- none. Not even close. Not- one- iota. So instead, the race card gets used by some people as a 'fail safe' device. It is sad, but true. 

Do you want an amateur running the United States of America? It seems that some terrorist factions also endorse Obama because they know that they can toy with and manipulate this little amateur. Obama thinks otherwise. Really? Want some tea and biscuits, sir? That is exactly what will happen. They will laugh at him. Bye bye national security! "We have an amateur at the controls!" the terrorists will say. Then the media can say "What have we done?.. What- have- we- done?". I have seen the media do slash jobs on people, groups and cultures. But 'this' hack job on Hillary clearly redefines the media in a far worse category than "The Silence Of The Lambs" & "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre", combined..

Obama wants to be diplomatic to terrorists? Seriously? Those days are over, sir. Died years ago. Died on September 11, 2001. We exist in a violent and corrupted future. The time of 'talking' with and 'befriending' terrorists is over, way over. Get it straight. What about the voices of the Jews in all of this?? Oh that is right- race is more important than experience, right?.. and race is more important than religion & security, right? Oh how foolish of me to even second guess that. Not. To some extent I guess the Jews are also being ignored too if Obama wishes to be 'diplomatic' to Hamas and Iran. In research I have discovered that Walter Mondale, who ran for president against Ronald Reagan for president in 1985 had a plan to "talk to Russia and 'offer' to do a 'nuclear warhead freeze'". Apparently he lost the race to Reagan. 

If Obama wins the race with a presidential nomination, then the aspects of "race and men", apparently, are superior to that of "gender and women". If Obama wins then it would be like putting a little boy in charge of brain surgery. Obama always speaks of "change"- like a broken record- over and over again. It is like listening to the infamous Barney song many of us hate to hear and cannot get out of our heads. If Obama wants to "change" anything, since that seems to be all he likes to talk about, he can change diapers at a day care. He is too young and IN- experienced. Get the facts and get real. If he had the moxie, the true charisma, the charm, the experience, the zest and the expertise then I would say nothing and wish him all the best. He has next to none of those things.

This man talks about universal healthcare for Americans. I hate to burst his bubble but Hillary thought of it first during the Bill Clinton era and was shunted for it. Where was Obama during all of this? I did not see him anywhere during her crusade for universal healthcare, did you? He most likely milked her ideas for all they were worth and when he had attained enough knowledge he 'broke away' and went on his own- like a dissatisfied partner or employee- a rebellion. These defectors most likely went to Obama for two reasons: 

(A): Good public relations for supporting an African American- can look mighty impressive on a resume and..

(B): Money. 

The race card has been abused here- to no end. Okay, here is something for some of you out there- especially those who love playing the race card- almost the same thing that was, apparently, played at the OJ Simpson murder trial in 1994 that had him exonerated. What about the gender card? The what? The gender card.. Were not women persecuted too?? Look at Hindu and Muslim countries where they treat women like utter garbage. So, what this all says to me, if Obama wins, apparently, is two concluding factors.:

(A): Race is superior than gender and.. 

(B): Men are superior to women. Women across the board will be let down if Obama wins. If Obama wins then I guess letters 'A' and letter 'B' are true. Obama may have more states and more delegates. He may have given some impressive speeches and he has. Does not mean he is qualified for the job. Obama is another version of Dan Quayle.

If people want there to be "the first African American president" in the United States that is fine, even though it will appear that race and men over power women. But for Pete's sake, get a guy in there who has the experience, training and expertise please- and not a 'wanna be' imitation. Obama is Dan Quayle 'all over again'. Powel had talent and spice. Colin Powel was a good African American politician for example because he was qualified and experienced. Still though, a lot of women will be let down and ignored. No other woman like Hillary will ever rise again for a long, long and "long" time. Oh well, right?? Who cares, right?? After all, Hillary is 'just a woman' who, according to her defectors does not know what she is talking about. Who started the mud slinging in the first place? Obama. Who backed him up with more admonition than the Oscars and American Idol? The media.

Womens voices have been, for the most part stomped on and have been ignored for centuries- if you wish to play the 'gender card'. If you do your research you will find that women have been persecuted and oppressed far longer than blacks. That is a cold- hard- fact. Is their sexism, to some extent against Hillary possibly by the National Press and/ or other media groups? Absolutely. If they did the same to Obama, they would be called racists. They do not want that. Good 'public relations' by the media, remember?

So, in conclusion, what will it be? Will it be:

(1): Hillary or Obama.? (2): Gender or race.? (3): Experience or nothing.? (4): Expertise or no expertise.? (5): Old and wise or young and naive.? (6): Endorsement from 'non violent or non racist groups' or endorsement from 'violent or racist groups'.? (7): Someone with a normal reverend or someone with a militant reverend.? (8): Purity or imitation.? (9): Knowing the controls or trial & error.? (10): Awareness or ignorance.? (11): A professional or an amateur.?(12): A no nonsense approach to terrorism or a nonsensical approach to terrorism.? (13): A 'fighter' against terrorists or a 'push over' for terrorists.? (14): Fact or fiction.? (15): Premium charisma or generic charisma.? 

This is how important experience, wisdom and expertise really is. Nobody, with a clear sense of understanding and crucial judgement wants a candidate with none of those things to run the country- nobody wants a hollow man at the helm. Too bad that Florida and Michigan have no voice and sit helplessly as other Americans get to vote. If this article hurts Hillary's chances of winning the presidential nomination and Obama gets the presidential nomination because of it, do not blame me with lame excuses. Red tape would have simply been bought off by the green. In fact, if Obama wins because of this article or not, this article will only gain strength and dexterity as a 'self fulfilling prophecy'. 

The future is in your hands..